Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided. The ethical decision-making model is attached.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:What is the ethical dilemma here?Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).A minimum of three references must be used.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines. An abstract is not required.Ethical Decision Making
Just as nursing applies a systematic process for evaluating the condition of a given population
to determine an appropriate intervention, health care providers must also utilize a systematic
process to assess the nature of an ethical dilemma to determine a reasonable solution.
Ethical decisions are reasoned choices based on:
The dilemma itself.
The principles in conflict.
The people involved.
The outcome of the proposed action.
The ethical reasoning process selected.
Ethical Decision Making
It is helpful to use a decision-making model for ethical dilemmas in order to guide one’s
decision making from an objective, cognitive perspective, rather than a purely affective or
emotional perspective. Uustal (1993) proposed the following steps to guide one’s ethical
decision making. Uustal’s model not only follows the nursing process, but also includes values
clarification when applying an ethical decision-making model.
Step 1: Identify the problem. Ask:
Who are people involved in the dilemma?
How are they related or interrelated?
What is involved in the situation?
After answering the above questions, identify the ethical dilemma and make a concise
statement of the problem. Then, state the conflict in values.
Step 2: State your values and ethical position related to the problem.
How does the issue fit with your personal values?
Are they congruent or incongruent?
Step 3: Take into consideration factors that relate to the situation and generate alternatives for
resolving the dilemma.
Step 4: Examine and categorize the alternatives. Identify those that are consistent and
inconsistent with your personal values.
If the most appropriate alternative is inconsistent with your personal values, another provider
may be needed to facilitate resolution. This eliminates bias and preserves your own ethical
Step 5: Predict all possible outcomes for those acceptable alternatives.
Consider physical, psychological, social, and spiritual consequences, both short-term and longterm.
What might happen if you follow Alternative A?
What might happen if you follow Alternative B?
Step 6: Prioritize acceptable alternatives. List them in order from the most acceptable to the
Step 7: Develop a plan of action utilizing the list of acceptable alternatives. Determine what you
are going to do about this dilemma.
Step 8: Implement the plan.
Step 9: Evaluate the action taken. Ask yourself the following questions:
Did I do the right thing?
Were my actions ethical?
Characteristics of Ethical Dilemmas
Following is a review of the characteristics of ethical dilemmas:
The choice is between equally undesirable alternatives.
Real choice exists between possible courses of action.
The people involved in the dilemma place a significantly different value judgment on
possible actions or on the consequences of actions. That is why there is a conflict. If
everyone involved agreed, there would be no ethical dilemma.
Data alone will not help resolve the dilemma. One always wants more data, but it is not
Answers to the ethical dilemma come from a variety of disciplines (e.g., psychology,
Actions taken in an ethical dilemma will result in unfavorable outcomes and/or constitute a
breach of one’s duty to another person. Although the action taken may meet the needs of
one person or party, it may result at the expense of another.
The choices made in an ethical dilemma have far-reaching effects on our perception of
human beings and definition of personhood, our relationships, and people in society as a
Any ethical decision involves the allocation and expenditure of resources which are finite. If
there were an infinite amount of resources to share with everyone in need, there would be
no dilemma in deciding who gets the scarce resource.
Ethical dilemmas are not solvable, but rather resolvable. A solution would mean that the
problem is fixed. A resolution means that a decision has been made to determine a course
of action in the situation.
When one is faced with an ethical dilemma, there are specific ethical questions to address:
What ought to be done in this case?
Who should be involved in the decision making process?
Who has the right to make the final decision? Why?
For whom should the decision be made: for oneself, someone for whom you are acting as a
proxy, or others?
What criteria should be used in a dilemma? Psychological condition only? Physiological
status, economic concerns, legal factors, social and family perspectives, or spiritual
What degree of consent should be obtained from the client?
What harm or benefits will result from the decision and resulting actions?
Does the ability to intervene justify the intent to do so? Just because it is possible, does it
make it right?
As a response to the growing number of ethical questions stemming from scientific
advancement, President George Bush established a President’s Council on Bioethics in January
of 2002. A significant step to approaching ethical dilemmas was made when the council
mandated the creation of ethics committees in acute care settings. These committees are
comprised of members from different disciplines in and outside of health care as well as
laypersons from the community. Committees often include an ethicist (educated in ethical
consultation), a lawyer, a quality improvement manager, a physician, a nurse, a clergyman or
other spiritual director, and an individual from the community at large.
In the coming together of differing experiences, educational backgrounds and unique
perspectives, the committee as a whole can produce a well-balanced discussion of alternatives.
In addition, these committees can provide recommendations intended to advocate for patient’s
rights and promote shared decision making, even in the face of the most challenging of ethical
dilemmas. While the alternatives and recommendations offered by an ethics committee do not
have the weight of law, they make a significant influence on decision making at the bedside and
have the power to influence a judge or jury during any deliberation involving patient rights.
As long as the delivery of health care involves human life, changing technology, and finite
resources, health care professionals will face ethical dilemmas on a daily basis. Often times, lifechanging decisions must be made quickly. Because of the long-term and life-altering effects of
many actions, it is important that ethical dilemmas be resolved in accordance with ethical
principles and theories. Just as health care professionals practice CPR in order to be able to
perform it efficiently in a real situation, it is important that health care professionals practice
ethical decision making in a classroom setting so that they are in tune with their own values and
are better prepared to make ethical decisions when they occur in the clinical setting.
Uustal. D. B. (1993). Clinical ethics & values: Issues and insights. East Greenwich, RI: Educational
Resources in Healthcare.
Purchase answer to see full
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.