Here is the question. The question comes from the attached work. Thanks for the
details regarding ethnography and paragraph regarding phenomenology. In
your view, are these two approaches necessarily mutually exclusive? Why
or why not?SEE QUESTION ON PAGE 2
As a branch of anthropology, ethnography seeks to explain human social behaviors
whereby it involves studying the impact of individuals’ cultures and beliefs on their behavior in
the society (Atkinson, 2014). It does this through looking at how exactly these persons interact in
their daily activities.
Nevertheless, ethnography has been reduced due to some reasons like; critics have
claimed that the approach is a bit unsuitable and ineffectual in explaining as well as analyzing
some composite surrounding concerns whose cause effects could be peripheral to the setting in
regard to the place including study time such as climate change. This particular method is prone
to unfairness, and for that reason, it mounts the likelihood of the investigator to alter the natural
occurrence of culture that is being researched due to being present in that particular social group
or society. This method is reduced due to the fact that is highly dependent on a specific
investigator’s reflection and understanding. The investigator is regularly working alone and this
implies that no one is available to countercheck the results for reliability. Again, this drawback
makes the oversimplification to be practically imaginary. The approach does not offer straight
answers to be quantified (Frost, 2011).
Furthermore, ethnography utilizes a triangle approach thus data obtained has to be
validated and verified. For instance, is data is gathered, it is usually deemed inadequate and
limited since the findings analyzed will display varying trends. A few scholars claimed that
ethnography breaches the commonly held principles of science that have concern in the utilized
data’s nature in the course of study involvements (Frost, 2011).
Phenomenological study, on the other hand, is concerned with clarifying and enlightening
on the happening of a phenomenal via studying its essence by examining and analyzing people
opinions who have encountered that phenomenon (Van Manen, 2014). Phenomenological
method does not give quantifiable and generalized data. Also, it is challenging and even hard to
institute reliability and validity of tactics embroiled, observations noted, and conclusions
gathered.
References
Atkinson, P. (2014). For ethnography. Sage.
Frost, N. (2011). Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches.
Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in
phenomenological research and writing (Vol. 13). Left Coast Press.
Question that needs to be answered: MUST BE 125+ words
Thanks for the details regarding ethnography and paragraph regarding phenomenology. In your view,
are these two approaches necessarily mutually exclusive? Why or why not?
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.